|
La Salle University Department of Education
EDC 477: Teaching and Research Methods II |
|
Dr. Sharon F. Schoen (215) 951-1192 (O) Course Description and Purpose Teaching and Research Methods II is a course designed to continue the development and facilitation of the knowledge and skills essential for beginning teachers. Specifically, this course focuses on planning and managing the teaching and learning environment, reflective thinking, managing student behavior, employing ethical practices, and developing a teaching philosophy. Students will utilize assessment and evaluation techniques relating to the implementation of teaching and/or management techniques that will culminate in an action research project. Students will also be engaged in using research to inform teaching practice and communicate those practices to peers. Preservice teachers will attend workshop sessions covering a wide range of educational topics such as interpersonal communication, multicultural issues, community resources, health issues, career planning, and legal issues. The course was designed in accordance with the Pennsylvania General and Specific Standards for certification in elementary and special education (M/PH), the Professional Standards and Practices of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), and the goals and competencies of the Department of Education at La Salle University. Course Objectives Students will be able to:
The students will satisfy the following objectives through workshop sessions:
Course Format The instructors of this course will model a variety of teaching strategies in order to create a dynamic learning community. Large and small group discussions based on practical experiences and readings will enable students to connect theory with practice. Short lectures, writing exercises, workshops, student presentations, role-playing, guest speakers, and videotapes will also be used to reinforce new information. All students are expected to be active participants in their own learning and to use critical reflection as a tool to enhance their teaching practice. Course Requirements Attendance/Participation 10 points The seminar format is one in which a group of individuals discuss ideas, knowledge, and perspectives with respect to a particular topic or focus. Active participation, therefore, is vital to developing a community of learners. In order to fulfill this objective, students are required to attend all classes, complete assigned readings in advance of each class, remain current on projects, and be punctual. Attendance at a professional conference may be expected. This will have an additional charge associated with registration. Resource Gathering Menu Activity 15 points Case Study Analysis 15 points Critical Reflection Action Research Project 60 points Grading 100-93 A 93-90 A- 84-86 B 87-89 B+ 80-83 B- 74-76 C 77-79 C+ 70-73 C- 64-66 D 67-69 D+ 60-63 D- 59 and below F Course Sessions See Page 4 Fall 2002 EDC 477 – Special Education Seminar Drs. Sharon Schoen and Carole Patrylo Mon, Aug 26 9:30-11:30 Student Teaching Placements Orientation – Handbook (not January entrants) In Dunleavy 1:00-3:30 Spec. Ed Seminar in Music Room (1:00-1:30) Intro, syllabus, project, menu activities (S.S.) (1:30-3:30) "Naming," "Reflecting," and "Acting" (C.P./F.M.) Tues, Aug 27 9:30-12:00 Cognitive Theory Family (S.S.) in Music Room 1:00-3:30 Continuation of "Naming," "Reflecting," & "Acting" Case Study Assignment (C.P./F.M.) in Music RoomWed, Aug 28 9:30-12:00 Humanist Theory Family (C.P.) in Music Room 1:30-3:30 Meet Supervisors in Dunleavy Thurs, Aug 29 Menu activity work – independent work Friday, Aug 30 9:30-12:00 Behavioral Theory Family (S.S.) in Music Room Mon, Sept 2 Labor Day Holiday Tues, Sept 3 9:30-12:00 Functional Behavior Assessment (S.S.) in Music Room 1:00-3:30 Social Learning Theory Family (C.P.) in Music Room Wed, Sept 4 9:30-12:00 Discipline with Dignity: Challenging Behaviors (S.S.) In Music Room P.M. Case Study Work Thurs, Sept 5 11:00-12:30 IDEA and IEP (C.P.) Case Studies due – give to C.P. in Music Room Fri, Sept 6 9:30-12:00 Menu Activity Sharing (S.S.) in Music Room Mon, Sept 9 To be announced Tues, Sept 10 A.M. To be announced 1:00-2:00 Combined Group – Journal Writing (S.S.) 2:00-3:30 Professionalism (J.H.) Dr. Schoen’s seminar will meet on Tuesdays from 1:00-2:00. Sept 10 Journal Writing/Professionalism Sept 17 Exploring Sept 24 Exploring/Legal Issues Workshop? Oct 1 Naming Oct 8 Oct 15 Investigating & Critically Reflecting/ Resume Writing Workshop? Oct 22 Mid-semester break Oct 29 Acting Nov 5 Legal Issues Workshop? Nov 12 Nov 19 Nov 26 Thanksgiving Holiday Dec 3 Complete project Readings * Selected readings will be copied, and in some cases bound, for you. You will be charged $20.00 to cover these costs. Assignments Resource Gathering Menu Activity The purpose of this assignment is to expose you to the vast resources that are available to special education teachers. It is important to understand that all teachers utilize a variety of resources to ensure that their students have enhanced opportunities to learn. This assignment will expose you to many new resources. Below is a menu of options that you will choose from in order to complete this assignment. You can earn a total of 15 points in this activity. This will require that you choose more than one menu option. You will need to be prepared to share this assignment with your classmates on September 6th. Make every effort to provide handouts, brochures, or other relevant information to your classmates. We will not be holding class one of the afternoons so that you can spend time working on this activity.
Case Study Analysis~ Due September 5th NAME
REFLECT
Person #3
Others:
ACT
Critical Reflection Action Research Project Purpose Because of our belief in the importance of critical reflection and problem solving as central to the characteristics of professional special educators, we have prepared a research project that makes use of these concepts. This semester long project will guide you through a process of observation, reflection, research, problem solving and action. You will be guided by being required to submit drafts of the project throughout the semester. The professors will provide feedback on your drafts. You will then expand on each draft as you work to combine it with the next step. At the end of the semester you will share and submit the results in the form of a paper and accompanying documentation to support your work. The nature of each student’s project will differ depending on the problem or dilemma that each student chooses to pursue. Together, the student and professor will fine-tune the project according to the needs of the problem chosen. Therefore, the appearance of each student’s final submission may differ. We urge you to choose an issue that is interesting or important to you, timely, and relevant for you and your student teaching site. The more relevant and interesting your project is, the more you will enjoy the process. Process and Requirements There are six steps in the development of the project.
The following "worksheets" will help guide you through the steps. Exploring Structured Journal Format
Future Considerations: Using your analysis in section two, describe how you will use the information gathered to solve the problem. The solution may be that you need to gather more information and you will tell us how that information will be gathered. Or, you might want to try a strategy that you have analyzed in section two. In either case, you will tell us what your next step will be in this section. (2-4 pages & the following "evidence of discussion" sheet) Evidence of Discussion Use this document to provide evidence of having discussed this phase of your action research project with your cooperating teacher, supervisor and/or other stakeholders in your project. Student teacher: _____________________________________ Date:___________________ With whom did the discussion take place? __________________________________________ Briefly describe the nature of the discussion: Briefly identify new ideas or new thinking that arose:
Signature of stakeholder: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Role (circle one) Cooperating teacher Supervisor Other (please identify role)___________________________________________ Naming Identifying your Issue
The dilemma, issue or problem that I wish to focus on is: I chose this because: I have considered the following perspectives: I plan to find out more by (identify potential sources of information such as data you might collect, people you might interview, research you will do, observations you must make): (This submission should be 2 – 4 pages in length, plus the following "evidence of discussion" sheet)
Evidence of Discussion Use this document to provide evidence of having discussed this phase of your action research project with your cooperating teacher, supervisor and/or other stakeholders in your project. Student teacher: _____________________________________ Date:___________________ With whom did the discussion take place? __________________________________________ Briefly describe the nature of the discussion: Briefly identify new ideas or new thinking that arose:
Signature of stakeholder: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Role (circle one) Cooperating teacher Supervisor Other (please identify role)___________________________________________
Investigating and Critically Reflecting Research and Data Collection Provide a summary of what you learned. Include relevant research and data. Be sure to cite your references and create a reference list using APA format. Your must reference at least 8 sources, at least 4 must be articles from scholarly publications. Data must be collected and presented. Include raw data, however graphic presentation for ease of interpretation is highly encouraged. (This will be a 6-10 page document, excluding your reference list, and the following "evidence of discussion" sheet) Evidence of Discussion Use this document to provide evidence of having discussed this phase of your action research project with your cooperating teacher, supervisor and/or other stakeholders in your project. Student teacher: _____________________________________ Date:___________________ With whom did the discussion take place? __________________________________________ Briefly describe the nature of the discussion: Briefly identify new ideas or new thinking that arose:
Signature of stakeholder: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Role (circle one) Cooperating teacher Supervisor Other (please identify role)___________________________________________ Acting Action Plan How will you use your research? What is your plan of action? How does your plan connect to your research? How do you plan to collect additional data? What will this data tell you? (This submission should be 2 – 4 pages in length, plus the following "evidence of discussion" sheet)
Evidence of Discussion Use this document to provide evidence of having discussed this phase of your action research project with your cooperating teacher, supervisor and/or other stakeholders in your project. Student teacher: _____________________________________ Date:___________________ With whom did the discussion take place? __________________________________________ Briefly describe the nature of the discussion: Briefly identify new ideas or new thinking that arose:
Signature of stakeholder: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Role (circle one) Cooperating teacher Supervisor Other (please identify role)___________________________________________
Analyzing
Summary and Future Directions Part A: Summarize your data. What happened as a result of your action? Summarize the effect of your action. Examine this action from multiple perspectives. What did you learn? What changes would you make? What future goals do you have? What responses, suggestions or criticisms did your cooperating teacher, supervisor or other stakeholder have when you shared your analysis with them? Part B: Understanding that personal philosophies of education are dynamic, what is your current philosophy of education and how does this project connect to, influence or fit with that thinking? (This will be 6-10 pages in length, plus the following "evidence of discussion" sheet)
Evidence of Discussion Use this document to provide evidence of having discussed this phase of your action research project with your cooperating teacher, supervisor and/or other stakeholders in your project. Student teacher: _____________________________________ Date:___________________ With whom did the discussion take place? __________________________________________ Briefly describe the nature of the discussion: Briefly identify new ideas or new thinking that arose:
Signature of stakeholder: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Role (circle one) Cooperating teacher Supervisor Other (please identify role)___________________________________________
Disseminating Put it all Together Create a final document that begins with a cover page, followed by a table of contents. The table of contents, and thus the document, should follow this order:
|